Amanda Gamban
Professor Knapp
English 1A
4 May 2013
Annotated
Bibliography: Fair Trade
Walton,
Andrew. "Consequentialism, Indirect Effects And Fair Trade." Utilitas 24.1
(2012): 126-13. Academic
Search Complete. Web. 27 Apr. 2013.
The author, a researcher from
the University of St. Gallen, use data from many different sources to argue two
consequentialist positions on whether people should by fair trade. The first
being a narrow positions on weather they should because it has a direct and
positive effect on poverty .The second being a wider position being if they
charity and fair trade both have a positive effect and also possible indirect
effects. Stating if people should just keep donating or people become bigger
part in consuming far trade goods. In contrast, other studies by Edwin Zaccï
are stating that there are many contradicting effects that come with Fair Trade
due to the consumer.
Zaccaï,
Edwin. Sustainable Consumption, Ecology
And Fair Trade. London: Routledge,
2007. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 29 Apr. 2013
The author, researcher from
the University Libre De Bruxelles uses data from many scientific projects and
research from other sources to test his hypothesis that if stainable
consumption stands at an essentially contradicting stage. His research is
analyzing the many contradictions of fair trade and if it is because of the
type of consumers there are. He intends to see if there are ways to change the
problem. The consumer has the most power in the fair trade world. In contrast,
other studies by Andrew Walton cited above are arguing based on two
consequentialist positions on whether fair trade is a solution to poverty or
fair trade and charity have a positive direct effect as well.
Third quarter score: 10
ReplyDeleteThanks for your hard work here!
Third quarter score: 10
ReplyDeleteThanks for your hard work here!