Amanda Gamban
Professor Knapp
English 1A
21 April 2013
Rhetorical
Analysis: “Killer Culture”
David
Kupelian the author of the article “Killer Culture” has written many other
articles such as, “7 Radical Things that would happen if Obama is Reelected”
and “Why conservatives are abandoning the ‘Gay’ issued”. Most of his articles are issues of the
American people with conservative points of view. The main audience that he is
trying to reach for this article is parents, so he could inform them of the
affects and outcome of this generation before it is too late. The audience is
also intended for other conservatives and republican Americans who share the
same beliefs as him. The audience reaction to this article if they did not
share the same beliefs as him would be shocked and possibly insulted.
In this
article the text demonstrates a character and tone that engages the reader. The type of character that Kupelian uses
within the text is formal due to the large amount research and evidence. He also
engages the reader by characterizing the text academically as he is trying to
inform the reader along with the use of hip vocabulary. Even though his style
of text is demonstrated well his sense tone is ignorant, too serious, and maddening.
Even though he supports his opinions with evidence he over states his view by
thinking that every teenager will end up horrible if affected by MTV, tattoos,
rap music or corporations like Disney, which is certainly is wrong and
disrespectful.
What Kupelian is trying to
accomplish in this article is to persuade the reader that corporations, rap
music, TV shows, tattoos etc. create outcomes that are extremely horrendous and
negatively influence this new generation of teenagers and kids. For example
describes to the reader that today children are exposed and strongly influenced
by a toxic attraction to trends. Such as “gangster nation” as Kupelian explains
that this cool trend is where kids are trying to act more black or gangster by
how they dress and act. Not only does he adopt a strong attitude against
today’s generation he reviles that the only way to make sure your child doesn’t
end up corrupted is by not exposing to today’s society at all . His point of
view is unmistakably shown throughout the entire article. In this article his
supports his text by not only by research but by comparing this generation to
what past generations have done and his own personal experiences.
In “Killer Culture” Kupelian arranges
the article so the reader can easily comprehend his perspective and evidence he
found. He thoroughly integrates his opinions and points of view with in his information.
How he displays his work makes it easier for the reader to understand where he
is coming from. By breaking his topics into sections the reader can see many
different examples of how Kupelian see’s this generation of teenagers as a “
Killer Culture”. He strongly emphasizes on the negativity that this new
generation brings instead of the good things, which can reveal too much bias to
the reader and minimize the view of how teenagers really are. Kupelian’s
intentions are only sought to be good but depending how the reader reacts to
his use of ignorant language and far-right views this article come across as a
slap to the face of how this generation has become.
Great RA. Thanks for deconstructing this text and revealing the heavy bias in his message despite plenty of evidence in support of his claims.
ReplyDelete